中国对日本实施报复，全面禁止海鲜进口。中国担心东京今天开始从失事的福岛核电站排放经过处理的放射性水造成的污染。活动人士和中国政府的最后呼吁未能阻止核泄漏，但国际原子能机构已经明确了这一点。去年，中国是日本海鲜的最大买家，进口了价值约6亿美元的产品。
海外网友评论：
@wangchung7599
6天前
Countries who believe that the Fukushima water is not harmful can continue to buy Japanese seafood.
相信福岛水无害的国家可以继续购买日本海鲜。
@joey3291
5天前（修改过）
Imagine replacing the country name from Japan to China, and what would be the US and its western allies’ reactions? What an amazing double standard here??? And the Japanese government never ever releases the content of radioactive isotopes in the treated water other than tritium, if their contents are really ‘negligible’, why not invite scientists to monitor and publish the results?
想象一下，将国名从日本改为中国，美国及其西方盟友会有何反应？这是多么令人惊奇的双重标准 ? ? ? 日本政府从未公布过处理水中除氚以外的放射性同位素的含量，如果其含量确实“微不足道”，为什么不邀请科学家监测并公布结果呢？
@maximme
5天前
if its safe, Japan can use the water for farming and other agricultural purposes.
如果安全的话，日本可以将这些水用于农业和其他农业用途。
@Bakedrabbit
5天前（修改过）
Japan can use treated radioactive water to build swimming pools, onsen and lakes for people/ citizens who wants radiant skin. Test it out for next 20 years or more . Only time will tell what is the outcome.
日本可以使用经过处理的放射性水为想要皮肤容光焕发的人们/公民建造游泳池、温泉和湖泊。在未来 20 年或更长时间内对其进行测试。只有时间才能告诉我们结果如何。
@TheGardenMG
4天前
same reason why China, US and French don’t use their nuclear cooling water for farming, you should spend more time in school and less on YouTube.
正如中国、美国和法国不使用核冷却水进行农业的原因一样，你应该花更多时间在学校上，少花时间在 YouTube 上。
@user-qm8oy5zp6s
4天前
@TheGardenMG Are the two properties the same? One is just cooling water, and the other is cooling water that has been in contact with nuclear fuel reactors. It’s like one is your bath water and the other is enema water, are they the same?
@TheGardenMG 两个属性相同吗？一种是单纯的冷却水，另一种是已经与核燃料反应堆接触过的冷却水。就像一个是洗澡水，另一个是灌肠水，它们是一样的吗？
@xulei6815
4天前
@TheGardenMG China and US is not a country lacking in water, while Japan is a country lacking in fresh water, which is the difference, Japan is short of fresh water, so why not use these “harmless” water
@TheGardenMG 中国和美国不是缺水的国家，而日本是缺淡水的国家，这就是区别，日本缺淡水，那为什么不使用这些“无害”的水呢
@user-ox6ry4oi7j
5天前
Two years later • : We have completed the release. We are truly sorry (bows).
Twenty years later : This was something done by people in the past, and it has nothing to do with us now. We are also victims (sobbing).
Fifty years later • : Radioactive wastewater?
What radioactive wastewater? There was no such thing as radioactive wastewater in history!
两年后 • ：我们已经完成了发布。我们真的很抱歉（鞠躬）。
二十年后：这是过去人做的事，与我们现在无关。我们也是受害者（抽泣）。
五十年后 • ：放射性废水？
什么放射性废水？历史上不存在放射性废水这种东西！
@gy5929
5天前
this release will last for next 30 yrs , wont be completed 2 yrs later
这个版本将持续30年，不会在2年后完成
@AlphaCookies
5天前
This is so Japanese. True to the point ???
这太日本了确实如此 ? ? ?
@ffbeexaid4509
2天前
yup just like how their youngsters now forget about the savage acts their ancestors committed in WW2.
是的，就像他们的孩子现在忘记了他们的祖先在二战中犯下的野蛮行径一样。
@itachiofthesharingan67
5天前
Western countries have remained silent. Why aren’t they condemning Japan? If this was done by China, or any other asian countries the whole world would probably be condemning it. This is a classic case of double standards.
西方国家却保持沉默。为什么他们不谴责日本呢？如果这是中国或任何其他亚洲国家这样做，全世界可能都会谴责。这是典型的双重标准案例。
@waikitjim5668
5天前
The UN should intervene. Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan. The UN should assign August 24 as “Save Ocean Day” to remind people of the importance of protecting the oceans. Can the UN speak up for Pacific Ocean?
联合国应该进行干预。太平洋不属于日本。联合国应将8月24日定为“拯救海洋日”，提醒人们保护海洋的重要性。联合国能为太平洋发声吗？
@lvjinbin28
5天前
why all environmentalists are silent? because it’s not about China?
为什么所有环保人士都保持沉默？因为这与中国无关？
@happymelon7129
5天前
Japan is nuclear contaminated water, which is in direct contact with nuclear reactor cores.
Other countries are nuclear wastewater, and there is no direct contact with nuclear reactor cores.
This is the difference between nuclear polluted water and nuclear wastewater.
日本是核污染水源，与核反应堆堆芯直接接触。
其他国家都是核废水，并没有直接接触核反应堆堆芯。
这就是核污染水和核废水的区别。
@narcolepticmartin
4天前
What angers me the most, is that the Japanese government has increased it’s military budget to 2.1% of its’ GDP, while a fraction of such budget could have gone to fix this disastrous contaminated water instead of releasing into open ocean.
最让我愤怒的是，日本政府将军事预算增加到GDP的2.1%，而其中的一小部分本可以用于修复这些灾难性的污染水，而不是排入公海。
@umeshutan6959
5天前
Regardless of whether the government bans seafood from Japan… I am not going to eat another piece of sushi or any seafood from Japan.
无论政府是否禁止来自日本的海鲜……我都不会再吃一块寿司或任何来自日本的海鲜。
@Couch_Coach_Karen
20小时前
I think this is a smart move. I won’t be eating any Japanese seafood for the next several years which is a total bummer.
我认为这是一个明智之举。在接下来的几年里我不会吃任何日本海鲜，这真是太糟糕了。
@user-ih9pg5dp7m
The IAEA is just a watchdog of the United States. Japan should invite experts from various countries to visit Fukushima. When Chinese experts say that the radiation water is OK, then it is really OK.
国际原子能机构只是美国的监督者。日本应邀请各国专家访问福岛。当中国专家说辐射水可以的时候，那就真的可以了。
@TanJooHiang
6天前
Japan should export their seafoods to those countries that they think its safe to buy and eat them as much as posssible for their own health!!
日本应该将海鲜出口到他们认为安全的国家，为了自己的健康尽可能多地购买和食用！！
@mikenicolas671
5天前
The discharge of nuclear wastewater into the ocean is already a very significant historical event! However, the Western media world lacks popularity, which is too scary.
核废水排入海洋已经是一个非常重大的历史事件！然而西方媒体界缺乏知名度，这太可怕了。
@MosesGTC
5天前
I wonder if people would react differently if it’s another country that is releasing wastewater.
我想知道如果是另一个国家排放废水，人们的反应是否会有所不同。
@RDJSR1
1天前
Japan should use the water for domestic use. BTW, does western led Atomic energy commission or other western agencies have any credibility in the east. Perhaps the sponsoring countries in these agencies should use the discharge for for their domestic supply
日本应该将这些水用于家庭用水。顺便说一句，西方领导的原子能委员会或其他西方机构在东方有信誉吗？也许这些机构的赞助国应该将排放物用于国内供应
@adax670
2天前
totally agree what china did . hopefully other country following .
完全同意中国的做法。希望其他国家也能效仿。
@samvan7787
5天前
If the water is so safe why don’t TEPCO executives drink the water and shower in that water?
如果水如此安全，为什么东京电力的高管不直接饮用这些水并用这种水淋浴呢？
@cliz30770a
5天前
This is more environmentally damaging than anything else. But protests are hardly heard from the usual climate etc. activists.
Or have I missed it?
这对环境的破坏比其他任何事情都更大。但通常的气候等活动人士中几乎听不到抗议。
还是我错过了？
@polycadence8482
5天前
No more Sushi for me.
Japan also bribed UN officials overseeing the consent process to dump by Japan.
Why didn’t Japan refill her reservoirs with the water or use it for crop irrigation if it were safe ?
我不再吃寿司了。
日本还贿赂了负责监督日本倾销同意程序的联合国官员。
如果安全的话，日本为什么不将水重新注满水库或用于农作物灌溉呢？
@coolinspirefunnybook1289
5天前（修改过）
its really a good decision for china to ban seafood from japan perfecture.because is indeed will / had been contaminated.
中国禁止从日本进口海鲜确实是一个很好的决定，因为确实会/已经受到污染。
@twood2032
4天前
I don’t understand why people even talking about whether or not it safe or not safe, anyone with half a brain will know it unsafe. It is just like a person pissing into a bucket full of swimming pool water and then dump it into the pool rather than directly pissing into the pool, there are no different.
我不明白为什么人们谈论安全不安全，有半个大脑的人都知道不安全。这就好比一个人往一桶泳池水里撒尿然后倒进泳池里，和直接往泳池里撒尿一样，没有什么不同。
@wongsoonkong3340
1天前
If the release water is safe dont understand why japanese wear protective gear during inspection??
如果放水是安全的，不明白为什么日本人在检查时要穿戴防护装备？ ?
@hanibee-bi7sw
2天前
As this icould affect global population, the UN should hold a vote on this issue.
由于这可能影响全球人口，联合国应该就这个问题进行投票。
@lc1668
5天前
A lot of unknown things regarding this polluted water long effects. It’ll take decades to get the consequences.
关于这种污染水的长期影响，有很多未知的事情。需要几十年的时间才能看到后果。
@industrialrobot434
5天前
America and europe should buy those radioactive seafoods from Japan for supporting Japan.
美国和欧洲应该从日本购买那些放射性海产品来支持日本。
@Laker123abc
2天前
If the water is safe, just let all Japanese drink it!
如果水是安全的，就让所有日本人喝上它吧！
